Skip to main content

Stop Misusing Alan Moore's Quote About Imaginary Stories, Dammit! by James Whitbrook


Stop Misusing Alan Moore's Quote About Imaginary Stories, Dammit
Whenever someone questions the logic of a film, book or TV show, it's almost inevitable someone will trot out Alan Moore's 'This is an Imaginary Story' quote from Superman #423 in response. But they're using it wrong - and in the process, completely missing the point of what Moore was saying.
First off, it's ridiculous to pass off a critique of a piece of fiction with the comeback of 'it's not real, so it doesn't matter'. There's a place in science fiction for stepping away from 'competency porn' and breaking into fantastical scenarios that might fall apart the moment you pick away at the surface (but offer something compelling upon a first viewing), but it doesn't make something not making sense any less valid, just because it's a piece of fiction. That's not how things work - otherwise, what would be the point of any logic in storytelling? You could just have something made of complete nonsense and that would be fine - because hey, it's imaginary, why should we care if we consume something that makes sense. It's not even an argument or a counter to criticism when used this way, wielded like a blunt implement being swung around brutishly - it lacks the finesse of a counterpoint. It's a way of shutting down discussions immediately, rather than actually engaging with them. That's a pretty stupid way of trying to prove a point, honestly.
And being used this way, it completely disregards what Moore was actually saying in his introduction to Superman #423. Many interpretations of the full quote place it as Moore almost rallying against the de-canonisation of past Superman stories ahead of John Byrne's reboot of the character post Infinite Crisis, but he's doing so much more than that - he's championing the power and scope of imagination, of imaginary stories. It's not necessarily a quibble about canon, but the fact that fantastical worlds like the comic book one inhabited by Superman can bind all of these stories together. That the canon and the non-canon can sit alongside each other because that's not what's actually powerful about these stories, it's the fact that they are products of imagination. His intro to Whatever Happened To The Man Of Tomorrow? brands all of Superman's tales as imaginary - but not to say that they don't matter, but to imbue them with an almost mythological sense of power that Moore so clearly saw in fiction. So while many people use it to argue that something shouldn't matter, Moore is in fact saying very much the opposite: fiction is a construct of imagination, and that imagination has power. It all matters.
So if you come across someone bemoaning a plot hole, or calling for common sense in a piece of fiction, don't misuse poor Alan Moore to try and shut them down. He doesn't want you to completely disregard something, he wants you to embrace it. That's the power of imaginary stories, after all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reivew: The Dark Tower

I've read the whole series and I've read all the comics... I enjoyed the movie. Lots of good things to talk about it. Few bumps. One or two bad moments. Overall, good movie. I hope they make more. So, let's get into it—and since I enjoyed the movie, it won't be that long of a review: more to talk about when it sucks :)  So, this is the world you know.... Now, the WHEEL has turned and Roland has been returned to the beginning....and yet, it's not the beginning as you know it, nor is THIS "The Gunslinger" the same as the one you've read, the world has moved on and many things have changed and yet some things are still the same ..... So, that's crucial point in understanding and accepting this movie as BOTH (book) 8 and yet the start of a WHOLE NEW ADVENTURE.  IF YOU CAN'T ACCEPT THAT, DON'T EVEN BOTHER WATCHING THE MOVIE   But for those who can, let us continue.    !SPOILERS!

Ink Master is BACK!

Yep. It's back! So let's do the rundown since we're already two episodes in.  FIRST!  They had to earn their shops this time, which was a fun and cool concept. By watching them do Convention Style Tattooing, you got to see a range of their skills. Most everyone did ok, with a few pointers needed here'n'there: Matti Hixson, Scott Marshall and Sausage (yes, that's his name) rounding out the overall best. Then they got into the final tattoos of the day, which was their choice...David Bell did a crushed skull and since he didn't represent it as being such, I think that's why he got picked out for it not being "readable"; but I think it was a cool. Randy Vollink did a water-color ship, which didn't look bad, but wasn't up to par. Keith Diffenderfer did an ugly, ghoulish woman...SORRY, no one wants an ugly chick on their body, I don't care who you are and the judges told him so. Everyone else kinda fell in the middle thereafter a

My review of Justice League

So, if you read my review of BvS: Dawn of Justice, and you follow me on FB and Twitter, you're likely surprised I even saw this movie. Me too. But, it just so happens an opportunity fell into my lap and so I decided to check it out. No, this isn't at all the JL I'd hoped for, but it's what we got. First, as I did with BvS I'll jump right in and say IT ISN'T TERRIBLE!!!!!!! (unlike BvS) Ok, Now, let's rate it: Overall, it's between a 6ish and 7, depending on what you think are the pros and cons, which we'll get to. (Again, I rated BvS a 3.5 to 5, so much improvement) The plot is kinda straight forward and so I won't really much comment, though, the gathering of the team was weak. To be fair, really, the first half of the movie was bad to not very good—it was really  simple, worse than childlike in it's reasoning: "Hey guys, lets make a team to save the world" and so, we'll cover each teammate in turn because